tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5246987755651065286.post2766817460419091764..comments2024-02-22T16:15:42.388-08:00Comments on cbloom rants: 03-02-15 - Oodle LZ Pareto Frontiercbloomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10714564834899413045noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5246987755651065286.post-1612982344702676732015-03-26T06:24:36.183-07:002015-03-26T06:24:36.183-07:00It's an excellent visualization methodology.It's an excellent visualization methodology.Cyanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02905407922640810117noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5246987755651065286.post-89919344664621849962015-03-10T07:29:04.512-07:002015-03-10T07:29:04.512-07:00Yeah, this "total time" is really just a...Yeah, this "total time" is really just a score. It should not be taken literally. You're right that "max" has some merit.<br /><br />I showed a few different options back here :<br /><br />http://cbloomrants.blogspot.com/2012/09/09-15-12-some-compression-comparison.html<br /><br />I actually think L2 mean of decomp & load time has merit.<br /><br />The issue is that actual "total load time" isn't the only thing you care about usually; you also want minimum CPU use, and you want minimum disk file size, for other reasons.<br />cbloomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10714564834899413045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5246987755651065286.post-31792584478640718582015-03-10T05:27:46.527-07:002015-03-10T05:27:46.527-07:00If the compressors can work in a streaming way wou...If the compressors can work in a streaming way wouldn't total_time be more accurately modeled as max(compressed_size/disk_speed, decompress_time)? The graphs would be significantly less curvealicious though.Ants Aasmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11737116288329565280noreply@blogger.com